After a high profile campaign led to increasing local, political and media pressure, EastEnd Homes has revoked the demolition notice they served on the estate of 4 low rise mansion blocks back in 2014. Instead they have agreed to residents' requests to “undertake further consultation on repairs/refurbishment options for the blocks”. The news came through in a letter from EastEnd Homes delivered to residents over the holiday period. The future of a 5th block which was also subject to the demolition notice is uncertain.
In March 2014, Eastend Homes served an “Initial Demolition Notice” as part of a feasibility study into demolishing the homes of 600 residents, a mix of social rents tenants and leasehold owner-occupiers. The charity's plans were to replace them with a new development of predominantly private flats aimed at the higher end of the housing market.
Unhappy residents, faced with the prospect of losing their homes, began a campaign to fight for the estate to be refurbished rather than demolished. In the absence of any meaningful resident consultation from EastEnd Homes, the campaign launched its own petition, recording almost 90% of households to be against the demolition plans.
The RSL has come under growing pressure to listen to their residents over the past 12 months as the campaign mobilised the support of other local campaigning groups, local media, politicians and Tower Hamlets Council. Local groups Tower Hamlets Federation of Tenants and Residents Associations, Tower Hamlets Renters, and the widely read Spitalfields Life blog offered early support for the campaign, which went on to be covered in national and international media.
Support came from across the political spectrum with Spitalfields ward Councillor Gulam Robanni and then cabinet member for housing Councillor Rabina Khan (both of the Independent Group) backing residents. Subsequently, the Labour Mayor of Tower Hamlets John Biggs and his team reassured residents that they would not support the demolition plans nor the CPOs required to clear leaseholders from the estate whilst the majority of residents were against demolition. Bethnal Green and Bow constituency MP, Rushanara Ali took the matter up in a letter to the Minister for Housing and Planning.
Meanwhile, EastEnd Homes had repeatedly tried to shut down the voice of residents through threats to the campaigners, media outlets who ran stories about the campaign, and cancellation and postponement of consultation opportunities.
Residents now hope that the revocation of the demolition order and pledge to refurbish might usher in a more co-operative chapter in the relationship with their social landlord.
Shamsur Rahman, a lifelong resident of the Holland Estate, said, “It was a great sense of relief when I received the letter from Eastend Homes revoking the demolition notice. The fight against it really brought our community together and our hard work and strong campaign has paid off.” He continued, “The next challenge is to ensure they deliver the promised refurbishment work. It’s been over 9 years since they took over our estate from the council but the blocks haven’t seen the improvements they need and that we’d been promised.”
Nainesh Tanna, a leasehold resident of the estate said, “When I received the news that the demolition notice was revoked I was on holiday in Rome with Magda, my wife. It was the best Christmas present that we received! What a great way to start 2016!”
Holland Estate was given to Eastend Homes by Tower Hamlets Council in 2006, on the condition that the housing stock be refurbished. But for 8 years, Eastend Homes ignored residents’ calls for this promise to be honoured. Instead, in 2014 they shocked residents by revealing demolition and redevelopment plans for their homes.
The estate is located a stone’s throw from Liverpool Street station on prime development land sandwiched between the City of London and the rapidly gentrifying East End. The mid-century L.C.C London stock brick blocks border several local conservation areas and nestle among the many listed buildings that comprise the architectural heritage of Spitalfields. The 5 blocks comprise 192 tenanted and leasehold low cost and social rent homes
Residents have said that the charity’s proposed redevelopment scheme of a 25 storey tower block containing 263 luxury flats for sale on the private market and only 165 “affordable” homes would have amounted to indefensible overdevelopment, purely driven by the desire for profit from the luxury apartments with which they had proposed to replace the estate. They argued that the charity would have been sacrificing the welfare of the current residents that they are supposed to be helping.